Skip to Content
SkillsRefactorTemplatesRefactoring Plan

Refactoring Plan Template

Use this template to document and track your refactoring effort.


Project Information

FieldValue
Project/Module[Project name]
Target Files[List of files to refactor]
Date Created[Date]
Author[Name]
StatusDraft / In Review / Approved / In Progress / Completed

Executive Summary

Goals

  • [Primary goal: e.g., Improve readability of payment processing]
  • [Secondary goal: e.g., Reduce code duplication]
  • [Tertiary goal: e.g., Improve testability]

Constraints

  • [Constraint 1: e.g., Cannot change public API]
  • [Constraint 2: e.g., Must maintain backward compatibility]
  • [Constraint 3: e.g., No changes to database schema]

Risk Level

  • Low - Minor changes, well-tested code
  • Medium - Moderate changes, some risk
  • High - Significant changes, careful attention needed

Pre-Refactoring Checklist

Test Coverage Assessment

MetricCurrentTargetStatus
Unit Test Coverage__%≥80%
Integration TestsYes/NoYes
All Tests PassingYes/NoYes

Required Before Starting

  • All tests passing
  • Code reviewed and understood
  • Backup/version control in place
  • User approval obtained

Identified Code Smells

Summary

#SmellLocationSeverityPriority
1[e.g., Long Method][file:line]HighP1
2[e.g., Duplicate Code][file:line]MediumP2
3[e.g., Feature Envy][file:line]LowP3

Detailed Analysis

Smell #1: [Name]

Location: path/to/file.js:45-120

Description: [Detailed description of the problem]

Impact:

  • [Impact 1]
  • [Impact 2]

Proposed Solution: [Brief overview of how to fix]


Refactoring Phases

Phase A: Quick Wins (Low Risk)

Objective: Simple improvements with immediate value

Estimated Changes: [X files, Y methods]

User Approval Required: Yes / No

#TaskFileRefactoringStatus
A1Rename variable x to userCountutils.js:15Rename Variable[ ]
A2Remove unused oldHandler()api.js:89Remove Dead Code[ ]
A3Extract duplicate validationform.js:23,67Extract Method[ ]

Rollback Plan: Revert commits A1-A3


Phase B: Structural Improvements (Medium Risk)

Objective: Improve code organization and clarity

Estimated Changes: [X files, Y methods]

User Approval Required: Yes

Dependencies: Phase A must be complete

#TaskFileRefactoringStatus
B1Extract calculatePrice() from long methodorder.js:45Extract Method[ ]
B2Introduce OrderDetails parameter objectorder.js:12Introduce Parameter Object[ ]
B3Move formatAddress() to Address classcustomer.js:78Move Method[ ]

Rollback Plan: Revert to post-Phase-A commit


Phase C: Architectural Changes (Higher Risk)

Objective: Address deeper structural issues

Estimated Changes: [X files, Y methods]

User Approval Required: Yes

Dependencies: Phases A and B must be complete

#TaskFileRefactoringStatus
C1Replace price switch with polymorphismpricing.js:30Replace Conditional with Polymorphism[ ]
C2Extract NotificationService classuser.js:100Extract Class[ ]

Rollback Plan: Revert to post-Phase-B commit


Detailed Refactoring Steps

Task [ID]: [Task Name]

Smell Addressed: [Smell name]

Refactoring Technique: [Technique name]

Risk Level: Low / Medium / High

Context

Before (Current State):

// Paste current code here

After (Expected State):

// Paste expected code here

Step-by-Step Mechanics

  1. Step 1: [Description]

    • Test: Run tests after this step
    • Expected: All tests pass
  2. Step 2: [Description]

    • Test: Run tests after this step
    • Expected: All tests pass
  3. Step 3: [Description]

    • Test: Run tests after this step
    • Expected: All tests pass

Verification

  • All tests passing
  • Behavior unchanged
  • Code compiles
  • No new warnings

Commit Message

refactor: [Describe the refactoring]

Progress Tracking

Phase Status

PhaseStatusStartedCompletedTests Passing
ANot Started / In Progress / Done
BNot Started / In Progress / Done
CNot Started / In Progress / Done

Issues Encountered

#IssueResolutionStatus
1[Description][How resolved]Open / Resolved

Metrics Comparison

Before Refactoring

MetricFile 1File 2Total
Lines of Code
Cyclomatic Complexity
Maintainability Index
Number of Methods
Avg Method Length

After Refactoring

MetricFile 1File 2TotalChange
Lines of Code
Cyclomatic Complexity
Maintainability Index
Number of Methods
Avg Method Length

Post-Refactoring Checklist

  • All tests passing
  • No new warnings or errors
  • Code compiles successfully
  • Manual verification completed
  • Documentation updated (if needed)
  • Code reviewed
  • Metrics improved
  • User sign-off obtained

Lessons Learned

What Went Well

  • [Item 1]
  • [Item 2]

What Could Be Improved

  • [Item 1]
  • [Item 2]

Recommendations for Future

  • [Item 1]
  • [Item 2]

Approvals

RoleNameDateSignature
Plan Author
Technical Lead
Product Owner

Appendix

  • [Link to relevant docs]

B. Reference Materials

  • [Link to code smells catalog]
  • [Link to refactoring catalog]

C. Tools Used

  • [Testing framework]
  • [Linting tools]
  • [Complexity analysis tools]
Last updated on